nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, v.45 25-28+36
竞技还是娱乐:乡村体育赛事的价值重构——基于参与式文化理论的村BA赛事实践分析
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email): 16234196610@qq.com;
DOI: 10.20185/j.cnki.1003-983X.2026.01.005
摘要:

本研究以参与式文化理论为视角,剖析中国村BA、村超等乡村体育赛事中竞技性与娱乐性的共生关系及其价值重构机制。研究发现,乡村体育赛事通过消解参与门槛、激活文化共创、实现社区赋权三大路径,突破传统体育胜负导向的价值体系,形成以全民共享为核心的新型范式。赛事将竞技性转化为娱乐参与的载体,通过规则软化、民俗嵌入、草根叙事等方式,构建起体育+文化的综合体。同时,村民以自治模式主导赛事运营,在商业资本介入、媒介奇观化传播等外部冲击下,通过选择性合作、文化反哺等策略实现价值平衡。这种创新不仅重塑了乡村体育的功能定位,更通过以赛促治、以赛兴文的长效机制,推动乡村文化传承、经济发展与社会治理的多维振兴,为乡村振兴战略提供了本土化实践样本。

Abstract:

Drawing on participatory culture theory, this study analyzes the symbiotic relationship between competitiveness and entertainment and their value reconstruction mechanisms in rural sports events like China's Village BA and Village Super League. The study finds that rural sports events, by removing participation barriers, activating cultural co-creation, and achieving community empowerment, break through the traditional win-loss oriented value system of sports, forming a new paradigm centered on shared participation by all. The events transform competitiveness into a vehicle for entertainment, constructing an integrated sports and culture complex through methods such as softened rules, the integration of folk customs, and grassroots narratives. Concurrently, villagers autonomously manage event operations. Despite external pressures such as commercial capital intervention and media spectacularization,they achieve a balance of values through strategies like selective cooperation and cultural reciprocity. This innovation not only reimagined the functional role of rural sports but also propelled the multi-dimensional revitalization of rural cultural heritage, economic development, and social governance through sustainable, competition-driven mechanisms for enhancing governance and fostering cultural prosperity, thereby providing a localized practical model for the rural revitalization strategy.

参考文献

[1]贵州省人民政府网.“村超”上榜2023年十大流行语!凭什么?就凭——[EB/OL].(2023-12-05)[2025-05-03].http://www.guizhou.gov.cn/ztzl/gzcfa/zxbd/202312/t20231205_83200936.html.

[2]李永皇,龙紫薇.乡村体育赛事助力铸牢中华民族共同体意识路径研究:以贵州“村BA”“村超”为例[J].原生态民族文化学刊,2024,16(6):12-23+153.

[3]杨忍,刘彦随,陈秧分.中国农村空心化综合测度与分区[J].地理研究,2012,31(9):1697-1706.

[4]蒲毕文,邓星华.我国乡村体育赛事发展经验及启示:以贵州“村BA”为例[J].体育文化导刊,2023(2):68-73+110.

[5]陈高朋,王鑫,李跃.中国乡村体育赛事治理的互动机制与模式创新:基于价值治理分析框架[J].上海体育大学学报,2024,48(5):11-26.

[6]郭庆.乡村体育振兴的新内生发展逻辑与实践探索:来自台盘“村BA”的案例分析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2023,57(6):12-18.

[7]古晓晴,蔡艺,杨前程.“村赛”热的冷思考[J].体育学刊,2024,31(1):44-49.

[8]王石峰,夏江涛.体育旅游助力乡村振兴的逻辑理路、模式选择与推进思路[J].体育文化导刊,2022(11):8-14.

[9]吴绍奎,熊文,王辉.贵州“村BA”现象与中国式现代化的逻辑耦合及实践启示[J].体育文化导刊,2024(3):23-30.

[10]王智慧.错落的喧嚣:“村BA”的社群动员与乡土竞技新秩序[J].社会学评论,2024,12(4):78-107.

[11]聂龙誉,王友郡.乡村体育赛事助力全民健身战略的当代价值、现实困境与实践路径[J].辽宁体育科技,2025,47(1):15-20.

[12]郭艺.构建非物质文化遗产馆参与式文化共享空间[J].民族艺术,2025(3):37-44.

[13]杨涌.“苏超”现象的传播密码和启示价值[J].城市党报研究,2025(7):62-65.

[14]费孝通.乡土中国[M].北京:人民出版社,2015:59.

[15]阎云翔.私人生活的变革:一个中国村庄里的爱情、家庭与亲密关系(1949-1999)[M].龚小夏,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2017:55.

[16]LUO Q H.A Brief Talk on Japanese Sumo Culture Journal[J].Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2023(9):50-51.

[17]埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事物的治理之道(集体行动制度的演讲)[M].余逊达,陈旭东,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2012:287-314.

[18]罗坤瑾,刘艳莎.乡村体育赛事的群体情感动员及空间仪式化生产[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2025,33(2):101-112.

[19]朱镇豪,徐成立,田静,等.我国乡村体育赛事发展的历史逻辑、现实困境与行动策略:基于结构功能主义AGIL模型[J].湖北体育科技,2025,44(3):54-60.

基本信息:

DOI:10.20185/j.cnki.1003-983X.2026.01.005

中图分类号:G841

引用信息:

[1]谷佳威,赵世飞.竞技还是娱乐:乡村体育赛事的价值重构——基于参与式文化理论的村BA赛事实践分析[J].湖北体育科技,2026,45(01):25-28+36.DOI:10.20185/j.cnki.1003-983X.2026.01.005.

发布时间:

2026-01-07

出版时间:

2026-01-07

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文