湖北体育科技

新修订《体育法》将体育纠纷解决机制改造为二维交叉结构，即以纠纷内容为轴的横向和以救济手段为轴的纵向。但横向纠纷内容中缺少体育行政纠纷一类，且与体育仲裁制度存在交叉困境。研究认为，体育行政法律关系的形成使得体育行政纠纷属于新《体育法》第92条中规定的体育仲裁受案范围。但由于体育仲裁具有契约性、自治性和专业性等特点，体育仲裁中的体育行政纠纷解决可能出现异化，并存在动摇体育仲裁中立性、公正性和公信力的潜在风险。故应当首先明确体育仲裁制度相较于诉讼程序的优先性地位和中立性地位，将体育行政纠纷按照行政机关层级分为国务院体育行政部门和其他体育行政机关行政主体的纠纷，从而建立起相对人衔接行政诉讼或直接行政诉讼的制度安排。

The newly revised Sports Law has transformed the sports dispute resolution mechanism into a two-dimensional cross-cutting structure, i.e., horizontal with the content of the dispute as the axis and vertical with the means of redress as the axis. However, the horizontal dispute content lacks the category of sports administrative disputes, and there is a cross-cutting dilemma with the sports arbitration system. The study concluded that the formation of sports administrative legal relationship makes sports administrative disputes fall within the scope of sports arbitration as stipulated in Article 92 of the new Sports Law. However, due to the contractual, autonomous and professional characteristics of sports arbitration, sports administrative dispute resolution in sports arbitration may be alienated, and there is a potential risk of shaking the neutrality, impartiality and credibility of sports arbitration. Therefore, it should first clarify the priority status and neutrality of the sports arbitration system compared with the litigation procedure, and divide the sports administrative disputes into the disputes of the administrative departments of the State Council and the administrative subjects of other sports administrative organs in accordance with the administrative organs, so as to set up a systematic arrangement for the relator to connect with the administrative litigation or the direct administrative litigation.